MISSION EXPOSE FRAUD IN CSM-2011-- Legal punches to UPSC.

Friends ,
 as part of strategy to expose fraud in CSM-2011 by UPSC, many of our victim Friend's have filed court cases in various High Courts to secure and safeguard their answersheets . Dear Friends , if u want to get benefit of this battle , then try to secure answersheets of all candidates of CSM-2011, till the final decision by courts  on the  deliberate confusion created by UPSC by denying answersheets under section 8(1)(d) of RTI act, 2005 (Inspite of clear cut decision of Hon,ble Supreme Court in CBSE vs Aditya Bandopadhyay)
 . Actually , their gameplan is to destroy answersheets by 2/3 july 2012, so that your main documents will be destroyed and then you will never able to prove that you secured more marks.{for any legal help you can contact Shri.Manish PARASHAR- 09253187965}

  ORDERS OF VARIOUS  HIGH COURTS GIVING INTERIM RELIEF TO CANDIDATE BY DIRECTING UPSC NOT TO DESTROY THEIR ANSWERSHEETS ARE GIVEN BELOW:-

   IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI



  W.P.(C) 3407/2012 and C.M.7219/2012



  NAVIN KUMAR NAVIN and ORS ..... Petitioner

  Through: Me. Pankaj Kumar, Adv.




versus



  UPSC ..... Respondent

  Through: Mr. Naresh Kaushik, Adv.



  CORAM:

   HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI



   O R D E R

   30.05.2012



  Notice. Mr. Naresh Kaushik accepts notice on behalf of the
  respondent.

  Counter affidavit be filed within six weeks. Rejoinder be filed
  before the next date.

  Until further orders, it is directed that the answer books/answer
  sheets pertaining to cases where the Court cases are initiated, shall not
  be destroyed until all legal proceedings upto the highest level have been
  concluded, and for a period of 60 days thereafter.

  List on 05.11.2012.





  VIPIN SANGHI, J

  MAY 30, 2012

  as





------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIW.P.(C) 3593/2012



MANISH PARASHAR ..... Petitioner

Through: Mr. Sudhir Vats, Advocate.


versus



UNION PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION AND ANR ..... Respondents

Through: Mr. Naresh Kaushik, Advocate for the respondent No. 1/UPSC.

Mr. Himanshu Bajaj, CGSC for the respondent No. 2.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI



O R D E R

01.06.2012



Issue notice. Learned counsel for the respondents No. 1 and 2 accept
notice.

Counter-affidavit be filed within six weeks. Rejoinder thereto, if
any, be filed before the next date.

Until further orders, the respondent No. 1 shall maintain the
documents sought by the petitioner under the Right to Information Act.
In all other cases where information is sought from the respondent under
the RTI Act, the information/document sought should be preserved till the
final conclusion of the proceedings in respect thereof.

Adjourned to 06.07.2012.



VIPIN SANGHI, J



JUNE 01, 2012

?BSR?




HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT BOMBAY  order in case of Ashish Kumar Karn:-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE  JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION  NO.  5467 OF  2012
Ashish Kumar  Karn ... Petitioner
V/s.
Union  Public  Service  Commission &  Anr.  ...Respondents
Mr. Abhijeet  Joshi  a/w  Mr.  D.B. Deshmukh  for the Petitioner
Mr. S.G.  Thakur  i/b  Mr. V. S.  Masurkar for Respondent No.1
Mr.  V. S.  Gokhale,  AGP  for  Respondent No.2 
         CORAM :  S.A. BOBDE  AND 
       MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ.
DATE     :  25
th
  June, 2012
P. C. :
. Mr. Thakur,   learned Counsel for   Respondent  No.1 seeks   two
weeks’  time to file  affidavit­in­reply.  The same  is granted.  In  the
meanwhile,  Respondent is directed  not to destroy  the Petitioner’s  all
answer  books.   
2. Stand Over  to  9
th
  July, 2012.
(MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.)         (S.A. BOBDE,J.)



MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT interim relief in case of Pawan Bansal:-

HIGH COURT OF CHATTISGARH order in case of Saurabh Tyagi:-

ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT order in case of D.AMARKESH:-